The S
tate of the State US History Standards 2011 are out and Virginia ranks 23rd among states and NAEP, and just 4 higher than the average, with a total of 6 out of 10 points. Content and Rigor is worth 7 points (VA earned a 5) and Clarity and Specification is worth 3 points (VA earned only 1).
The main complaint is disorganization and, ironically, a lack of pointing out Virginia's significance in the founding of our nation. Furthermore, they claim there is a "disproportionate space" given to American Indians, unimportant facts, and even errors (the founding of the two-party system under Adams instead of
1796.)
The scoring was done by the
Thomas B. Fordham Institute and apparently did this in 2003. In 2003, they gave Virginia a B, so according to them, we got worse.
In their ranking, South Carolina earned the top mark with an A and a perfect 10 out of 10. So, what makes them so special? Answer:
This document. It's over 100 pages of detailed explanation of what's being taught. It explains what's important, what's not important, and what students have already learned about the topic in previous grades.
Quite frankly, it's a pretty handy guide for Virginia teachers.
It also details the types of assessments you should give, for example: "They should be able to infer long term consequences for minorities in the post-war period such as the civil rights and women’s rights movements."
With limited knowledge on South Carolina's scoring system, it seems however that students do not score very well on their End-of-Course Exams. According to
this table, 53.7% of the students fail the test. Does that mean Virginia's SOL is too easy? Will the new test show a statewide decline this year?
Anyway, take a look at both documents and see what you would like as a resource for the SOLs.